I just lost what little respect I had left for Tomatocage. This is unfortunate, I once considered him a pillar of this community.
In case you didn't notice, QS left you the trust that fixed your trust issue.
Bahahaha, I just saw that as well. Bit ironic that the person who tries to stand up for you and prevent you from having a TWC tag is the same person who you decide to insult for being put back onto DefaultTrust.
That said, I've been away for a while, but I never had an inherent problem with QS. He did leave the occasional weird negative trust but generally his ratings were (are?) accurate.
QS:
This was the insult.Quickseller didn't fix anything, all he did was make it so I don't have ? ? ? any more. I still have a ZERO trust rating after hundreds of trades and 4 years of activity because Vod feels it is appropriate to destroy peoples trust ratings because he does not like what was said about him. Him leaving a rating for me doesn't change my opinion of him, and if anything I would prefer he had not left it, because we have never traded or even hardly had any direct interaction. Furthermore he calls my left ratings into question. I am curious which actual rating(s) he takes issue with, because unlike you jamokes I try to limit my ratings to people I have had direct interaction or trade with and have used negative ratings sparingly. Additionally my posts have noting to do with the default trust, but with how the rules are selectively enforced regarding it (specifically Vods systematic abuse of it). I don't consider this a favor, even if he intended it to be.
I left the rating because you had previously expressed legitimate concerns about your ability to trade effectively and efficiently due to what is essentially a de facto trade with caution rating due to vod's negative.
I do think that you do want to be put back in the default trust network although a good number of your posts reflect your wish to do away with the default trust system.
I am not sure why your trust score shows as zero when you have so many positive ratings. My interpretation of how trust scores are calculated means that your trust score should increase by 12 points every month.
Maybe theymos can comment as to why your rating is not 100+ that it appears you should have. (The formula is somewhat complicated ) - he can comment if he wants to but I figured it out. When you have a negative rating, only ratings since after your first negative rating are counted for your trust score.
You are welcome to have your own opinion of me. If you want the positive to be removed then confirm and I will remove it.
If you don't agree with Vod's rating then I would suggest contacting TC with your concerns. He may or may not ask Vod to change it to a neutral however I would consider him to be fair and IMO he is a very good moderator of the trust ratings sent by people on his trust list, he really should teach a class or something on how to moderate the trust ratings of people on his trust list.
I primarily do not trust the negative ratings that you leave. Although I also don't trust the positive ratings you leave for people like WC (who is pretty clearly a scammer).
Edit: it looks like that Vod removed his rating so I will remove my positive that countered his negative.
