I didn't mean to start this topic as a competition about the metric. My concern is that I'm being shown that sometimes I'm innaccurate, but I can't really tell which of my reports were the innaccurate ones. That seems a little broken. Why tell me at all if I can't use the information to improve?
Well, the accuracy system is feedback, although it may not be as in-depth as you were hoping for it's not useless it does give you a general idea of how you are performing, overall. The thing is with providing a in-depth feedback system which would allow you to see what was rejected and what reason it was rejected for, could potentially be subjective. Therefore, if you see that x post got rejected by one moderator, you might refrain from reporting it again which in the eyes of another moderator could be a correct report. At least that's my interpretation of one of the issues.
I guess this makes sense. Perhaps reading too into it would be a mistake.
Well, I guess I've made my request. If it was easy, it'd be nice to see the list of your reports and what happened with them. If it's not easy I guess it's probably not worth it. Thanks for the discussion guys. I'll leave the thread open in case theymos or some other admin or something has further comments, but I think I'm done here.
Cheers