But it is indeed child's play, in comparison to the real intent/goals behind this project. Focus should be on the actual necessary steps to achieve the goals of this project. Bells and whistles should come after a minimum viable product. This does not qualify as an MVP because at the current state of the project is is essentially (on the surface) a copy of other qt-clients already developed. I only hold this coin for the mere potential behind the concept, not  because of a developer who has proved his worth.