I prefer to fix a problem once it occures. It's good to have a solution at hand but it's called "obsessive compulsive bahviour" if you fix problems that don't exist.
You mean like waiting until your engine dies before worrying about putting more gas in the tank?
Maybe Gavin has OCD. Ever thought about that?
Or maybe he's just proactive instead of reactive. Ever thought about that?
Please ignore Mircea and his band. You're in for a better experience doing so. They have authority issues with Gavin and are going to spew up just about anything to support their goals (removing Gavin).
Fixing a problem once it occurs is the worst method. Mircea would rather get an STD than wear protection.

It seems rather irrational to wait and see how it plays out and if things go downhill then try fixing what we could have prevented in the first place.
Well if Gavin's predictions are correct, it might be too late or very difficult to apply a fix beyond a certain threshold. Adding to the problem is the fact that things can go downhill extremely fast in crypto, a single wave of panic-selling could be enough to bring Bitcoin to it's knees. I suggest that people interested in the topic read Gavin's own words/notes and make up their minds rather than trusting other people's version of the story.
http://gavintech.blogspot.com/2015/01/twenty-megabytes-testing-results.htmlPeople really have weird reasons to why they are objecting Gavin's proposal.
I do understand but can't we just wait and see what are the problems when block size reaches 1MB.
There seems to be a group of individuals that can wait. I'm pretty sure that they use reason often.

Update:
I didn't understand what you "really" meant. Maybe you can clarify?
I'm trying to say that there is a group of people who think otherwise.