Simply they either need to relocated to somewhere else or slowly die while dragging the rest of community with them.
When they have indicated that a more modest increase in max. block size (such as the 8MB that Gavin has stated he would accept) would be acceptable then why do you keep trying to turn this "storm in a teacup" into some sort of Others vs. China battle?
If China ends up abandoning Bitcoin then I really don't see how that would be any sort of victory for Bitcoin at all.
China is not the only country in the world with bandwidth issues so I guess next you want to get rid of any developing countries as well and after a while pretty much Bitcoin
will just be USA coin. To that I say - no thanks.
No but it's one of the few countries in the world with restricted internet access (GFW) . Now name me how many other countries are in that category?
No it won't be a USA coin, as a matter of fact everybody can access the Blockchain and send/received transactions even in China or Africa or even moon but mining of it becomes more difficult because it's not like before anymore where all you needed was cheap hardware along with cheap power equals to profit.
Lets get this straight, being able to accessing the network is not the same as being able to mine on it. You keep bundling these two together to benefit your flawed argument.