1) So now it's rational to carry a nuke into a city to get back at a robber, not caring about others that could be hurt?
Why do you keep trying to put words into my mouth? You brought up irrationality. Not me. I just called it a terroristic act.
2) Why does it appear that I'm prepared to commit an act of aggression? Please explain that. There's no objective threat there. You might "feel" threatened, but that doesn't matter one whit. Right? If there isn't an objective threat there's no need to pull your gun. Or is there a subjective threat here somewhere? One that you're responding to?
Because you are pulling your gun out and removing the safety. Unless we're at a gun range, that indicates you might soon shoot someone. Don't be surprised if people around you act on that indication.
3) So there is a threat? Why else would you prepare yourself? You do not prepare yourself for non-threats do you? It would be fun if you did though. "Ahh, a kitten in a blanket, I must draw my weapon and prepare to defend myself from this non-threat!"
Silly man, kittens can't shoot you. But a soldier carrying his weapon like he's in a war zone can, and all too often, does.
4) That's not for you to decide how I use my property.
Not when it harms others.
And you still haven't answered what you believe the outcome will be of handing a nuke over to Al-quaeda or similar organization. Is that question really so hard to answer?
I've already told you. The largest terrorist organizations already have nukes. I don't expect much to change by a smaller one getting one.