I use moderation as a gauge of credibility.
- -
Moderation of a thread is for weak-ass losers IMHO.
- -
censorship
- -
Moderation of a thread is for weak-ass losers IMHO.
- -
censorship
Every reasonably advanced thread is indistinguishable from magic, and therefore attracts non-intelligence and trolls like a honeypot. Letting them destroy the vestiges of readable discussion that might once have existed, is your holy commission.
Bet you don't even have a thread as you seem not to care about your readers even that much
i have to agree with tvbcof on this one (whoa!).
we've had disagreement about info you published yourself in one of your moderated threads about me that was incorrect and that you weren't willing to correct at first. watching others get info deleted by you on request was quite frustrating for me. i definitely got the sense that there was an asymmetry of power that a moderator has when being able to censor the info only he deems necessary. i don't think it's fair especially when it got down to me feeling as if i had to beg. sure, someone is always posting incorrect info about me but i suck it up and try to debate for the truth.
to be fair, even the moderators around here, like BadBear, are notorious for censoring what they don't like. unlike you, those guys really piss me off b/c oftentimes it was out of retribution. overall, i'd never create a moderated thread.