OP has a history of promoting ponzis
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1067700.msg11467402#msg11467402He knows the scam is about to end soon and is trying to cover himself.
Pretty sad people will accept pay for an obvious ponzi like that. I was half temped to start dropping negatives on those people myself, but decided against it.
You should do that. Dropping negatives on those running the scams are of no use as the warnings are not seen by all those being affected by signature.
At minimum, crazyearner and legendster should get negatives. They are the biggest offenders in terms of impact.
I was in that for less than 1 week I moved away from it because admin never responded and the OP closed it. So how is this a history. This and that one is a total of 2 since having my account from mid 2011 so hardly a history at all. I jumped on it and seeing it was a good paying one with admin then seen the type of site it was and moved away
Joined May 27 as quoted above
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1067700.msg11467402#msg11467402Removed June 1
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1067700.msg11508724#msg11508724So that is 7 days and within them days business was paying to its members and running fine up until around day 4 or 5 where admins had gone MIA So after this removed as shown above.
With everything else going on I am reading more into this one I am on and will see how things work out as I am in in process of setting a meeting up in person to see if really is legit company or just plain ponzi and scam.
Checking the section of campaigns linked and also now made aware of the cloudthink thread, going to have a good read though that tonight.