Why do you belabor this point instead of focusing on your errors about 9/11?
You're right, I just checked and I misremembered something. There wasn't a second bombing attempt in 1998 - that was actually a robbery. So even though the buildings had been in the news twice in the decade prior to 9/11 there had been only one prior attempt by terrorists to destroy the towers.
But why are you focused on circumstantial innuendo and not on the hard physical science of it?
I couldn't move on with my life until I had researched the hard science of it. I just had to know. I don't understand why others would be so apathetic?