The assumption of either position for or against as absolute, is anti-science.
Science is the process of questioning the 'experts' and testing.
It is when we stop questioning, that science ends.
In this case you are both more right than wrong.
An absolute position against unknown anthropogenic experiments with the ocean and the atmosphere is
not anti-science. The position, that changing the composition of the ocean and the atmosphere doesn't change the climate in the ocean and the atmosphere is not only anti-science; it is a super-hyper-idiotic position.