This thread is misrepresenting the Truth
Be Careful

This is what John Matonis said, "Block size hard fork debate is instructive because
it's precursor to inevitable fork revising block reward that increases 21m cap."
I don't see the point in pretending he didn't say something he said.

He was being sarcastic...? Is Jon Matonis against the hard fork? If he is, he's trying to say Gavin's move is a precursor to a shit storm coming in BTC land.
If XT succeeds, increasing the 21m cap would not seem farfetched. At least in his eyes.