Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Bitcoin or gold?
by
GreenStox
on 22/06/2015, 14:47:47 UTC
Gold is supported by governments and rich individuals who like power and control.

Bitcoin at the moment in the big scheme of things is a small market cap minor distraction to these people.  Should it start to grow to a point where the people above feel threatened or start to loose some power or control they will simply ban Bitcoin.

Some may say you cant ban bitcoin etc. but if the government do decide to ban it a large % of population will cease to use it preventing it becoming mainstream causing the price to crash.

Russia and China are buying gold as quick as they get their hands on it for a reason, the same cant be said for BTC



They cannot ban it anymore, i mean it has passed the "ban singularity" at this point the only thing they can do is to tax it or regulate it. Or atleast try doing those.

They cant ban it because more then 80.000 merchants use it, and we got a strong lobby community + politicians already ask "campaign donations" in bitcoin, so my impression is that they like Bitcoin, because anonymity is good for them too.

Anonymity? That's why there's cash. Bitcoin transactions are fully traceable.

So does cash, but the barrier is much higher. There are already politicians that ask for "donations" for their campaign, if they get it from cash then all the info of the donor is traceable since the IBAN code of them links it to their private bank account.

But with bitcoin any person can "donate" to them and only leave a trace of how much bitcoin they received but certainly harder to trace it back.

I`m sure alot of politicians love this feature and would receive "donations" this way.