I'm more of the opinion that Bitcoin will succeed, provided that it does not fail, and that a misstep can easily be worse than doing nothing.
Intelligent people may disagree with this.
The question is, what more qualifies as "doing nothing":
- Letting Bitcoin operate with constantly full blocks, which has never been done before, or
- Continuing to let Bitcoin operate with non-full blocks, effectively uncapped,* as it always has
?*
Of course a large part of the debate is over whether the current hard cap is actually doing anything. So the appeal to conservatism implied by "doing nothing" just pushes the question back.Your question presumes omniscience thus it is not falsifiable. Junk science.