The only thing of substance that you said there is
You refuse to acknowledge the
Logic of Collective Action. Thus you refuse to acknowledge reality. How much more disingenuous can it be.
However, the nature of the attack that is most disconcerning is where the monopoly is censoring transactions. This will be impossible for any minority node to prove with evidence.
1) Censoring attacks do not work unless you have 100% of the miners. It only takes a single pool/miner not colluding the break the censor and include the transactions.
Holly sister of ignoramus, you don't understand how a 51% attack works. Please go back to Bitcoin 101 training wheels school.
2) Yes it is easy to verify and communicate censor attacks (if they even are pulled off) by an honest node. That node would have the valid transactions, with fees, that are never added to blocks. It doesn't take long to start to ask why there is a pool of transactions not confirming or are only in blocks that are being orphaned from the MC.
How do you prove they were sent to the network and not just some scammer trying to take over the network with false evidence? DUH. DUH. DUH! You are a fucking idiot. (you fail to appreciate that is why we needed PoW consensus in the first place)
And (orthogonally) if these are rare and only for targeting dissidents amongst the billions of KYC compliant masses?
And (orthogonally) if these transactions don't have KYC and the masses have agreed that KYC is good (as they have!).
Again, you simply do not understand anything about Bitcoin or the dynamics of how it works. These are 101 concepts you can't seem to grasp.
You are talking to the mirror dude. Cripes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effectThe DunningKruger effect is a cognitive bias wherein unskilled individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly assessing their ability to be much higher than is accurate. This bias is attributed to a metacognitive inability of the unskilled to recognize their ineptitude.