I'm concerned about wallet validated purchases.... Burn to play. DRM systems have traditionally been closed source, but in-wallet closed source is going to turn away much of the tech croud. Without them your project will not only suffer from lack of good developersbut also a community who finds that the coin is broken/bad everytime they seek support.
Also note that application liscensing has long been a target for hacking, so the likely-hood of building a copy protection off interacting with another app will simply result in a clone of the other app. As for in-wallet applications that are closed source.... are you stupid! Torjan a maleware will quickly make this a no-go.
Take it easy. That part is just a small thought and is not even part of our official roadmap..Also note that application liscensing has long been a target for hacking, so the likely-hood of building a copy protection off interacting with another app will simply result in a clone of the other app. As for in-wallet applications that are closed source.... are you stupid! Torjan a maleware will quickly make this a no-go.
We are a very welcoming and supportive community and we have no intention to smear the image of crypto
I don't think making another alt coin should be taken so lightly. Many have tried and they are all still considered a group of alternatives to something else. A hand full of alternatives can be a good thing, but when just plain anyone starts another project simply because they can it might undermine the validity of the project they are alting.
Having a clear set of goals for improving bitcoin would be a positive thing, but you should only fork from the main project after making an effort incorporate your goals and having been rejected on more than a number of occasions.