They cannot handle 11.6MB unconfirmed transactions then how will they handle 20 MB blocks with 200 MB uncorfirmed transactions ?
It would be dramatically more expensive to spam the network with 200 MB of transactions.
It will be more expensive with 1 MB block. The bigger block the cheaper spam.
but also way more expensive for Bitcoin's growth prospects as new users get turned away or fed up. Cripplecoin, in the long run, fails to the benefit of Blockstreams SC project.
you keep ignoring the fact that miners can filter spam; if they want.