Edit: @Qickseller, Why did you voted No? I thought you are the one at the top of the list who want this, what is your opinion ?
Of course I voted no. The forum has no business regulating what people are saying as long as it is somewhat coherent. By forcing people to have a report signature abuse link on any paid signature the forum would be forcing people to say something.
I think campaigns (and companies that campaigns are advertising) should do a better job of preventing people from posting useless garbage. They should be proactive in preventing people with weak posting histories from joining and when someone that is already in a campaign starts to post weak posts, they should quickly be kicked from the campaign.
Stingle doesn't even enforce all of the rules in his campaign. I PM'ed him a few weeks ago about someone who had two accounts enrolled in paid signature campaigns, one of which was in his campaign, and was due for payment in two days, and gave him blockchain evidence that was undeniable however he paid them on time and allowed them to continue participating. The person was a heavy user of luckybit.