You said you were in front of a computer before and if you can post on here then you can very likely return the money. And maybe you've now realised that you can get more from signatures or hoped that op wouldn't complain but I still think you just planned to chargeback from the getgo.
This is why campaigns should not accept people who have negative trust or other reports of scams when they have clearly scammed.
Which campaigns do?
Is there no Provision on this Forum to Ban a user who openly admits to
Scam people and Abuse people in-front of all users over here , in this case the user kralle openly fails to abide forum rules and he still can abuse people and post and eventually earn from some
signature campaignsYou are one ugly motherfucker
.
I don't think there's many if any signature campaigns that would allow such a user but if there was I'm sure we could persuade them to kick certain scammers off or risk a public backlash. No campaign should be allowing such scammers on to their campaign as it looks bad for them first and foremost but scammers should forfeit the right to earn any further money from their account.