Really this bitcoin experiment is showing us that we need some sort of system where by we pay 20% to the government for services like policing etc and a small percentage to the banks for handling transactions so we dont get scammed.
No it doesn't. It just shows you need personal responsibility.
what about the personal responsibility of the people who didn't read the wording of the bet closely?
They did, Matt simply lied and broke his own contract. Then again you being his sockpuppet would already know that.
If you/Matt really believe that interpretation would stand up to a third party why not agree to arbitration?
1) Matt agrees to arbitration on
http://judge.me2) All bettors who also agree to arbitration escrow their bets.
3) Matt escrows an amount equal to the bettors who escrowed.
4) The escrow agent awards funds based on the outcome of
http://judge.meMatt has no interested in arbitration because no impartial third party could possibly see Matt's tortured interpretation of his contract as legit. Nobody could, not even Matt/you.Oh and ignored. I already ignored your main account Matt so obviously I am going to ignore your sock too.