Is there any reason you don't provide proof of solvency? I don't mean too stir up drama, but I was just wondering why you don't provide proof of your bankroll.
I thought this has been pretty well established already. It is because they don't have the bankroll they claim to have. Their intention is to eventually scam in some way either by stealing from a high roller or by stealing from one of their investors although doing so is going to be more and more difficult based on how much they are spending on their signature campaign (although some of this is them paying themselves) and on various giveaways (also possibly to themselves)
Alright, I have all the info I need. Thanks.