There are two problems with your desire to win arguments in this one:
1) Stealing an encrypted wallet does nothing, hence it being pointless (if the password is long enough)
2) You're the one that was preaching that you're 'un-hackable' in some thread; so why wouldn't satoshi be as well?
There is no way that someone was able to trick a man who did so much to extensively and successfully hide his identity from everyone in the world. I hardly doubt that someone so proficient and intelligent would download some malware or key logger. As for the everyday theft, how do you steal Bitcoins from a person if you don't know that he/she owns them?
1) Stealing an encrypted wallet does nothing, hence it being pointless (if the password is long enough)
2) You're the one that was preaching that you're 'un-hackable' in some thread; so why wouldn't satoshi be as well?
There is no way that someone was able to trick a man who did so much to extensively and successfully hide his identity from everyone in the world. I hardly doubt that someone so proficient and intelligent would download some malware or key logger. As for the everyday theft, how do you steal Bitcoins from a person if you don't know that he/she owns them?
uhm i said real life thief also, which has nothing to do with cybernetic thief, it could be that someone knew about his treasure when bitcoin became big, and thus he forced satoshi to reveal his password or whatever, you are basically telling me that there is no chance that this could have happened, which is blatant wrong
my un-hackable fortress has nothing to do with this...seeing how we are talking about different type of thieves