Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] [GDC] GadgetCoin | Smart Contracts on Hardware | IoT | M2M
by
altcoinUK
on 04/07/2015, 16:16:09 UTC
I understand why centralization is required in the software, but I think the lack of decentralization will keep the digital currency community away from Gadgetnet.

decentralization and digital currency  is tools, for giving user better and more convenient services with lower cost.

I can understand that, I am the biggest supporter of this project and I agree with most of what they do. I only stated the fact that the lack of decentralization is issue for the larger community.

Anyway, I couldn't care less that users  - who debate all day long about absolutely irrelevant technicalities like the fucking POS 50% attack and other nonsenses - stay away because this is centralized. I care about technology very much and I promote Bitcoin for years, but I had enough from that nobody is using the fucking thing after 5 years of struggle. Finally projects like this and Tilecoin try to break the ice and bring digital currencies to businesses.

And I was not moaning, it is fine by me if the larger digital currency community don't like this idea. Less VICR contract will be sold and my coins will have more value. There will be less competing stakeholders and I can run more streaming nodes.
They can keep debating about POS/POW and other absolutely irrelevant malarkeys. Why those subjects are irrelevant? Because nobody is using the 1000 exchange listed fucking alt currencies in the first place, except day traders for P&D. In the meantime this project can prove that digital currencies can bring value to businesses, and most importantly we will make money here.