The thing is, as we've already seen, people will begin abandoning a pool that reaches 50% of the network hash rate.
So a pool operator reports half his actual hash rate, and offers double the going price per share.
By the time people figure out what is going on, forkage has happened, and people with transactions in the last N blocks get to spend their bitcoins again.
Security that depends on "people" voluntarily exhibiting a specified schooling or herding behavior is problematical. Suppose "Anonymous" decides to fork the block chain.