Again, statistically it doesn't matter, it's just an issue with people that want to always get paid even for small periods of time.
If a coin is profitable, it still is regardless of difficulty.
you have your math - i have my practical stats, and it says - don't mine when those coins are on yaamp,
both too fast or too slow, if you want to mine those coins themselves - go to coin's pool or solo, not yaamp
that is all good and well if that is YOUR opinion ...
especially when considering yaamp.com is actually gone ... it is no more ...
the pool that is being discussed at the moment is a NEW pool ...
how does that make mining at another pool or solo any different to mining using that pool that is being discussed ...
its not yaamp.com - its just using the code ...
#crysx
i mean yaamp's code, not site, just try and see for yourself,
multialgo switching makes huge difference
i see what you mean ...
on this fact alone - it does seem that way ...
multialgo switching has abrupt changes to contend with and so suffer share rejects everytime the switch happens ...
this is a loss of shares and productivity - even though they are small between switches ... we have seen this happen with our own miners / farm ...
but that is with ANY multialgo multipool - not just yaamp.com ...
look at epsylon3 .. he is one hell of a developer - and now running his own yaamp-coded pool with more algos added ...
it sort of goes to show that if even a seasoned developer like him is willing to look at - setup - and improve the code - then the pool code is still on a reasonably good level ...
nicehash has the same sort of issues ( though they dont mine coins - just divert hashrate ) with multialgo switching ...
so much so - that they devote an entire section on the website to it ...
single algo / single coin pools may be more 'efficient' ( for lack of a better word ) at mining - but we believe that the losses are so minimal thats its close to negligible ...
#crysx