Now that's what I call progress, we are getting in touch with reality, LOrrav above and now you darteous.
The innovation I care about is the distribution and usage planned from the beginning that no other coin has had.
I wouldn't call this innovation, but yes that's the only novelty, a centrally planned distribution that will take years and avoid normal market forces.
That's what most of said since the beginning btw.
I don't care of the coin itself is not better than the other good coins out there.
For all we know there are no killer properties and it comes pretty late to the party.
So, yes it's most likely not better at all, rather mediocre.
The image and growth the coin has from the start is what is going to make this coin.
The image is certainly an epic failure until now at least.
As for growth, we don't know yet, lets see what the central foundations holding "all" the funds will make of it.
Most coins don't get things going in the beginning anywhere near fast enough and get weighed down with tons of bag holders by the time the coin has anyone looking at it.
Hmm, not sure, Neucoin seems to be sluggish at the moment. Since there is no technical innovation as you said yourself and plenty of funds have been raised a long time ago... If I were you, I would drop this argument (just IMO)
As for the weighing down, typically centralized economies and the intrinsic political processes weigh themselves down single-handedly.
Again, glad that we finally came back down to earth.