I am also fine with it if the multialgo is not 5 times more secure but i think we should be honest and not use this as a marketing gimmick then (i was using this to get more followers for Digibyte but then i was confronted with the truth)

In the OP :
With 5 unique algos & independent difficulties a 51% attack is significantly mitigated and becomes much harder to carry out.
More secure than a single POW mining scheme (much harder to 51% attack).

which is not true. Only 60% SHA256D hashrate is needed to be attacked.

The security would be likely worse or at best 'on par' with a standard single-algo coin (said by the guldencoin dev (MaNI) here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=554412.msg11804113#msg11804113)

I am just saying that we should do marketing with real facts and not with lies.