As for the models doing it while keeping other platforms, wouldn't that be counter-productive? The whole point of getting established or successful models would be to bring with them their current constituency for they would hardly benefit from a no-traffic website. A bit confused by this potential scenario...
I am sorry but what is the confusing in the business plan that an established model performs daily 30 minutes live group show on Jizzmo.net for a 95% share and then she bugger off to do whatever she does somewhere else?
The model does it on Jizzmo as a daily show by bringing to here her paying viewers, because other platforms
a) simply don't support the live group show feature
b) don't pay out 95%
Regarding the operation cost, you are again assuming that there is no traffic and no revenue on the platform, but you are assuming that the large operation cost is there. Somehow it is a logical inconsistency. How can be large operating cost for a non working platform? I am not sure the boys here what kind of DAC will run, but people are running serious businesses with £10K per month operation cost in the UK - a top accountant cost £500 per month. I think you are overstating the operational cost.
The main operation cost is the infrastructure which only scale when there is traffic consequently there is a revenue. And regardless what you think, my calculation is based on real leased server cost instead of your laptop cost. You can get 10TB traffic on 500 gbps bandwidth for US 300.00 per month - that's how I derived the US$ 3.00 cost for a US$ 500.00 streaming revenue.
And again, you don't even assume that in the Jizzmo platform can be advertisement revenue at all. All providers drive revenue from advertisement - but in your opinion no, Jizzmo can't.
OK Barabbas, I need to go to do something else, and later I will do more research on this subject. As always it was a pleasure to talk to you :-))))