100% wrong. He is one of the scammers, running a similar high interest borrowing scam just like the others.
Survived the crisis? 100% wrong: he owes withdraw obligations he cannot meet (because it's a standard scam, and remember I'm batting 1000% with labeling these as such) HINT: he's never going to meet them, start the process of the long stall for this scam too.
BrightAnarchist - you quote the evidence, but can you make any statement about the OP edits, deleting the month-over-month fiscal data? (data which I believe are total fabrications, mind you) still just blind faith with no reasoning?
I expect a full apology when this scam goes like the others I have predicted before they failed.
If you didn't believe the data, what does the deletion of it change?
It shows that the person who posted it doesn't want to be committed to it, suggesting that it was falsified.
Your logic must be beyond my comprehension.
I'll let you work out what the consequences of that are.
Hey we get it already, you think he runs a scam. WE ALL UNDERSTAND THAT, I am not even defending patrick right now. Just stfu and gtfo already, you have heard the phrase before saying, "Winning a argument on the internet is like being the smartest retard." Congratulations, you have won this argument already, now stfu.
If you think he is correct, why is he the one you're asking to shut up?
I'm not in full agreement with him about Patrick and his last post changed my view a bit. Why isn't he entitled to make his case?
I do think he has made his case. And the horse is very very thoroughly dead. It in no way can help the community when a new person comes to the forums and every thread that mentions prominant characters on the forum suddenly gets a response explaining how that person is scamming.....its like cyber bullying/stalking. I don't agree with his tactics. Make your case and hope people listen. The I told you so mentality has just gotten old.