So I see 2 threads of why islam hates people or why people hate Islam. I dont see the point of such a mundane debate based on religion any debate for or against religion would be stupid. Either you are stupid to believe what a prophet / god / divine entity said or you are stupid enough to believe you can change the minds of the bleak minded people who follow such a prophet / god / divine entity.
But since its fun let me initiate my own brand of 'why do' topic.
WHY DO ATHEISTS (like me) HATE RELIGION ?
Seriously what has to happen in a person's life for them to seriously give up hope on the one true everlasting brand (of religion) which their ancestors have followed for generations.
Everyone has their own story even I have mine, so lets hear some of it.
I am kind of an atheist. I don't believe there is a divine entity controlling the whole universe. I believe in people . Anyway, my point is that atheists might hate religion because they think some of the arbitrary rituals and superstitions are really irrational and unfair. Mostly people who think more scientifically and don't just follow blindly what their families teach them come under atheists group.
I have never been religious, but grew up in an environment where most people subscribed to a religion, but weren't the most serious about it. Over time, I've seen almost everyone I know distance themselves from religion. Most religions succeeded from localized knowledge, before the internet. I think the internet has changed the game, and it's very difficult to condition kids these days, when they have access to whatever information they choose.
I think religion is fine as long as it is tolerant and considerate of people that don't subscribe to the same belief system. Once you need to start convincing other people you are reading the right book and the other books are wrong, then it becomes an annoyance. With the internet and access to information, the trend is moving away from religion as each year passes.
Religion is about what people believe and do. It doesn't have anything to do with changing the essence of what the human being really is. Because of this, the idea of departure from religion is a misnomer The departure isn't from religion. It is from formal religion. Or it is from known and accepted religion.
What is the departure from known and formal religion to? It is to a different religion. It often is to a religion that doesn't formally accept God, or one that suggests that there is no religion - a religion of no religion. Much of the time it is to a religion of humanism, where mankind thinks that he is God, even though he doesn't say it in those words. For many it is simply a departure from morals to wild and loose living.
The one thing departure from religion is not is, the departure from religion. People who think such either are not stating what they think is really happening, or they are lying, even if it is only to themselves.
The nature of mankind is such that man always seeks religion... always seeks God to some extent. A big part of the reason for this is that man does not know for a fact anything even an instant into the future.
Consider the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. They were in their next movement in life. Some were walking down the sidewalk, perhaps heading for the bomb shelters as the air-raid sirens were blaring. They knew, as they were taking their next step, almost exactly where their foot would land. And then they were gone.
We simply do not really know. Because life and the earth are reasonably stable, our experience deceives us into thinking that we know a short way into the future. But we don't know. Our inner soul cries out for help from God. Our personal religion seeks to stabilize that part of our life that is unknown. There is no non-religion. There is only different religion.
