I made no demands for wealth distribution nor made any accusations of malfeasance. (you putting words in my mouth)If at all I was giving my opinion on the situation. If you don't like it that's your problem.
I admitted I was wrong in getting my facts mixed up, that wasn't enough for you was it? Not a problem.

Carry on being so eagerly able to point the finger when you find something wrong with what someone says on this forum, even after admission you still are all hyped up and passionate about your stance to go so far as to the point of putting words in my mouth.
lol classic
First of all, calm down. No need for the
bold and underlining. My eyes aren't *that* bad!

Second, you are aware lawyers are currently attempting to forcibly redistribute Frap.doc's coins (from his wallet to their own).
So when you say "I believe he should return the funds" that sounds exactly like an endorsement.
Hiding behind the "giving my opinion" excuse is a distinction without a difference.
And you ignored the part where I made fun of your conceit that it's merely a coincidence your mixed up facts *just happened to* paint Frap.doc in the worst possible light.
Putting words in your mouth isn't nearly as bad as your cheerleading an effort to steal another man's coins.
Funny how correcting you on the facts (commission != equity) made absolutely no difference to your conclusion...
