Re: PSA: cypherdoc is a paid shill, liar and probably epic scammer: HashFast affair
cypher.doc has dragged down the whole reputation of bitcointalk.org standing with his shennagins. All members of standing are also the injured parties now along with the HF customers who didn't get timely deliveries. Pleading guru status to justify his 3000BTC cha-ching! from hashfast is asinine, not unlike his other arguments in the technical realm where he is clearly out of his depth, yet perseveres with the zeal of a paid shill.
He needs to first declare all other pecuniary interests in the bitcoin realm before redeeming any kind of credibility in ANY kind of bitcoin-related debates, given his proven history to covertly shill. Regardless of the particulars surrounding whether he has scammed or not in the HashFast case, which seem like a conveniently convoluted rabbit hole of Byzantine proportions.
IOW, the facts be damned, because they threaten your preferred narrative.
I read Fap.doc's OP on his Hashfast pump (and dump?) thread. It's a stone-cold fact that he played off the (mis)conception that he's some sort of a Bitcoin guru to pimp Hashfast junk.
I didn't wade through the entire thread but his comments near the end were similar. He's at very best a miserable failure in terms of analysis and dilligence. Probably much worse would be my guess.
He needs to first declare all other pecuniary interests in the bitcoin realm before redeeming any kind of credibility in ANY kind of bitcoin-related debates, given his proven history to covertly shill. Regardless of the particulars surrounding whether he has scammed or not in the HashFast case, which seem like a conveniently convoluted rabbit hole of Byzantine proportions.
I do understand the 'common practice of paying sales agents commissions'. I just think that most people who pay or are payed are fucking scumbags most of the time. Nothing I've seen dissuades me from characterizing cypherdoc as such. I've simply not studied Hashfast enough to make a determination one way of another, and have no compelling reason to do so.
IOW, the facts be damned, because they threaten your preferred narrative.
I read Fap.doc's OP on his Hashfast pump (and dump?) thread. It's a stone-cold fact that he played off the (mis)conception that he's some sort of a Bitcoin guru to pimp Hashfast junk.
I didn't wade through the entire thread but his comments near the end were similar. He's at very best a miserable failure in terms of analysis and dilligence. Probably much worse would be my guess.