Just because it was supported by a judge in a court of law of the U.S. doesn't make it right. Do you agree with every decision that every US court has ever made?
Just ignore him. He does everything he can to defend HF and derail any thread that is critical of HF.
Your approval of smoothie's retreat into generalities about "every decision that every US court has ever made" after losing on the specific facts of the matter at hand has been noted.
How does correcting factual errors and requesting people consult primary sources "derail" threads?
Obviously, what you meant is that I "derail" your preferred narrative and its concomitant lynch mob.