...
To make Frap.doc the poster child for BTCT scams is ludicrous, especially as the court has yet to declare his coins anything other than legally earned sales commission, and HF anything other than a victim of changing business conditions.
Your statement seems to imply syntactically that the court
did declare the 3000 BTC a 'legally earned sales commission'. Got backup for that? That was not the impression I got on my one pass through the audio. My take-away was that the judge simply said that it was inappropriate for the plaintiff to attach the BTC at that time. IIRC, he specifically said that the question about what the 3000 BTC actually are could be worked out by an appropriate court at some point in the future.