Just because it was supported by a judge in a court of law of the U.S. doesn't make it right. Do you agree with every decision that every US court has ever made?
Just ignore him. He does everything he can to defend HF and derail any thread that is critical of HF.
+1 for the suggestion of outright ignoring Icebreaker. They have a long, established history of fiercely shilling for Hashfast.
I question their motivations in this thread, beyond the obvious trolling and shit-posting.
Does smoothie *disagree* with every decision that every US court has ever made? No? Then what is the relevance?
I can't help but notice your entire post consists of character attacks and speculation about motivation.
Is there a reason you prefer mindless tea leaf reading to discussing facts gleaned from primary sources?
Did I offend you by countering the dominant local narrative with an unpopular opinion (albeit one in line with off-line consensus reality)?