The judge seemed to nullify your rather stretched 'presumption of innocence' by indicating that bankruptcy court was simply not the venue for adjudicating the question. You seem to be flailing pretty hard here and it is unbecoming of you. I don't think that you should count legal skills among your talents and would advise strongly that you seek qualified legal assistance if you find yourself in legal troubles.
"Flailing...unbecoming...unskilled...etc."
My previous response did not once focus on your person, yet you unleash a torrent of ad hom insult in yours.
Let's focus on facts, not personalities.
The judge certainly did not "nullify" anyone's presumption of innocence.
I could make hay of such a silly, unbounded leap in logic and respond in kind to your invective, but will instead choose to be the better man.

Torrents of ad hominem insults? Silly, unbounded leaps in logic? Invective? All of this right here on trolltalk? Who could have imagined such a thing?