Well, at this point i consider you a being cypherdoc himself or being paid by him. Its unbelieveable how you fight for him and when you miss arguments then you go attack with other means.
I cant believe someone would come in here and fight with that time and aggressivity while having nothing in return for him. Cypherdocs case is clearly not just and surely the payments to cypherdoc will be shed light on at another time. A lawyer not being able to convert this would need to be replaced otherwise.
Well iCEBREAKER, i went through the hassle and clicked through your untrusted negative feed back you piled up, it seems you were a shillboy for hashfast in the past already. Guess that explains why you think cypherdoc deserves the payment. The amount of posts we see is not the real amount of posts he did to shill for hashfast.

Besides that... you are a troll how its defined normally. I guess discussing with you makes no sense since when you dont have arguments you get personally attacking, derailing the topic. I think ill stop now waisting time with you.
Standing up for the truth is its own reward. That you belive I need some kind of external/financial motivation says more about you than me.

The Motion to Attach Frap.doc's coins failed. The judge literally laughed at and ridiculed ("LeBron James of Bitcoin") the lawyers' arguments in favor of it.
It was brought by Katten, one of the most powerful law firms in the world. You aren't going to find better lawyers.
Of course you blame the lawyer for the Motion failing, because your narrow mind cannot accept that it failed on the plain facts of the matter.
Instead, you flagrantly violate Occam's Razor with paranoid delusions that cypher and I are the same person, etc.
I guess Judge Montali is, in your mind, a troll and possibly the same person as cypher/myself.
