If he wanted to scam, why would he specifically say that he had access to the accounts.
Why? So he can be seen as a good guy doing good and not a scammer. This is what he has done several times. Why did he make out like he was trying to do a good thing in getting a scammer to return the money? So he can look good. But what he was doing behind the scenes was trying to extort and blackmail that person to send him money or he was going to go to the police. That's not an act of altruism. It was opportunistic attempt to extort money out of someone. The loan was just likely so everyone knew the account was hacked. He desperately wants his feedback removed and to look like the good guy so what better way to 'ethically' hack the account then give it back? How trustworthy of him! I don't buy it.
I really don't want to take his name but all the things that happened in this case are pointing finger on one person.
I really don't want to take his name.
What the hell are you talking about?
If anyone have the copy of those 1k people then i can tell you his name. But you have to promise me that you will not reveal his name here on the forum.