Andressen asked for the analysis and methodical science behind btcdrak's choices for Viacoin's total supply, block time and block size.

Which was in reply to btcdrak's criticism of the apparent lack of  analysis and methodical science behind Andressen's intended Bitcoin block size quick fix.

The exchange of words is filled with patronizing remarks such as "annoying troll" and "put up or shut up", hardly the language one would expect to hear from the chief scientist at the Bitcoin Foundation.

I was wrong, It's very clear that Andressen overstepped the mark the honorable thing to do would be for him to retract apologize produce the requested peer review or step down.  What's the purpose of a Bitcoin Foundation anyway other than lining the coffers of a select few