ah, iCE coming to his senses. thank you.
tvbcof, otoh, still a flaming idiot troll little dog:
Guess im not trained enough in hearing english in order to understand this really. Maybe some other reader can write what the file is about? Its long too.
But maybe you can tell why you think that payment is justified. You are the only one yet, i read of, that thinks he could deliver anything near or over 3000Bitcoins worth.
Best I can tell, iCEBREAKER is saying that cypherdoc helped scam people fair and square, and attempts to use 'violence' to clawback theill-begotten 'nobly achieved' gains from him are improper.
This seems to be the standard party line from the hard-core Libertarian wing throughout the history of Bitcoin (or at least since I've been involved.) I've actually come around to this viewpoint somewhat relative to my initial stance. That said, I don't really believe that calling attention to cypherdoc's malfeasance are 'violence' in the standard form (such as use/mis-use of the state sponsored judicial system.) Cypherdoc made a big thing of all the due dilligence he did before pumping Hashfast (and nothing at all of the money he was making shilling for them which, in fact, he tried to hide to the extent that he would flat-out lie to Maxwell about it.)
Cypherdoc can keep his money as far as I'm concerned (which is easy for me to say as someone who didn't even bother to know what-the-fuck Hashfast was much less send them (and cypherdoc) a bunch of my BTC.) What comes around goes around. In the mean time, informing people of his reliability in terms research and suggestions and the like should offend no one. Not even uber-Libertarians.
Don't believe tvbcof's malicious, defamatory gossip. His distorted version of events is not supported by the primary source.
It's not about what *I'm* saying, it's about what the Judge is saying.
Clue for clueless tvbcof: the Judge didn't mention "the standard party line from the hard-core Libertarian wing throughout the history of Bitcoin."
We know you hate Ayn Rand with the fiery intolerance of a supervolcano, but please don't flat-out lie to SebastianJu about what was said and decided at the hearing.
All that happened was that cypherdoc got a 10% sales commission for helping HF fund their ASIC.
Unfortunately BTC's price and difficulty shot up faster than HF could build their machines. But cypherdoc had nothing to do with that.
That's why the judge ruled the lawyers, having destroyed the company itself and now desperately looking for a way to pay themselves, could not take his coins (at this time).
tvbcof, otoh, still a flaming idiot troll little dog:
https://people.xiph.org/~greg/cypherdoc_fraud_hearing_1.mp3
Primary sources are our friends; gossip is not.
Primary sources are our friends; gossip is not.
Guess im not trained enough in hearing english in order to understand this really. Maybe some other reader can write what the file is about? Its long too.
But maybe you can tell why you think that payment is justified. You are the only one yet, i read of, that thinks he could deliver anything near or over 3000Bitcoins worth.
Best I can tell, iCEBREAKER is saying that cypherdoc helped scam people fair and square, and attempts to use 'violence' to clawback the
This seems to be the standard party line from the hard-core Libertarian wing throughout the history of Bitcoin (or at least since I've been involved.) I've actually come around to this viewpoint somewhat relative to my initial stance. That said, I don't really believe that calling attention to cypherdoc's malfeasance are 'violence' in the standard form (such as use/mis-use of the state sponsored judicial system.) Cypherdoc made a big thing of all the due dilligence he did before pumping Hashfast (and nothing at all of the money he was making shilling for them which, in fact, he tried to hide to the extent that he would flat-out lie to Maxwell about it.)
Cypherdoc can keep his money as far as I'm concerned (which is easy for me to say as someone who didn't even bother to know what-the-fuck Hashfast was much less send them (and cypherdoc) a bunch of my BTC.) What comes around goes around. In the mean time, informing people of his reliability in terms research and suggestions and the like should offend no one. Not even uber-Libertarians.
Don't believe tvbcof's malicious, defamatory gossip. His distorted version of events is not supported by the primary source.
It's not about what *I'm* saying, it's about what the Judge is saying.
Clue for clueless tvbcof: the Judge didn't mention "the standard party line from the hard-core Libertarian wing throughout the history of Bitcoin."
We know you hate Ayn Rand with the fiery intolerance of a supervolcano, but please don't flat-out lie to SebastianJu about what was said and decided at the hearing.
All that happened was that cypherdoc got a 10% sales commission for helping HF fund their ASIC.
Unfortunately BTC's price and difficulty shot up faster than HF could build their machines. But cypherdoc had nothing to do with that.
That's why the judge ruled the lawyers, having destroyed the company itself and now desperately looking for a way to pay themselves, could not take his coins (at this time).