Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: How to contact tomatocage
by
Muhammed Zakir
on 23/07/2015, 08:51:22 UTC
I'm not against Quickseller (I've never even interacted with him/her) but I really feel this issue needs resolving.
tspacepilot is not a scammer.

Is there no way you can remove this negative trust Quickseller? For the good of the forum?

Please!

Be a good man & end this dispute.
I don't want to get too involved but this does need resolving once & for all.

Look at 'TradeFortress' trust (The guy at the centre of this dispute)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=67058

Tspacepilot did withdrew coins he got using "bot chat". See reference link -- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=303613.msg11163154#msg11163154.

Don't mix things saying "TF is a scammer, so no words said by him can be trusted or is true" which is the exact argument of yours and tspacepilot's.

You don't mix things, MZ.  I admited that I was experimenting with bots using TFs approval and help.  I admited that there were a million bots on that site and that I was merely one of many people experiminting and learing about the API. I admitted that it was my first time dealing with asynchronous code and that I made mistakes.  I never found out if or how much I might have gotten from any mistakes because TF was making up numbers (lying!) about how much he wanted repaid.  If he had been more reasonably, it's completely possible that I owe him 10Ksat or something like that.  However, he wouldn't be talked to about it.  He merely said PAY BACK X OR BE BANNED.  And every time he said X it was different.  His first X was like 1.5 bitcoin which I didn't even have at the time (it was waaaaay more than I had withdrawn from his site, ever), then he started picking other numbers but wouldn't say how he was generating them.  Sounds a lot like a scammer himself, right?  Well, what has history shown us here?  And what would you do in such a situation?

 -snip-

The thing which makes me hard to believe that was a mistake is your bot's name, "b0t". See the bolded part of SaltySpitoon's post -- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=303613.msg3270393#msg3270393.

However, as you did not have any scammy/shady behavior, I think its good to change negative feedback to neutral.

Edit: I guess BadBear does not think violating TOS deserves a negative trust.

-snip-
It seems more like a violation of a site's TOS, than a scam, and not really deserving of negative trust. If that deserves negative trust, then so do people who abuse dropbox referrals, or buy Facebook/youtube likes and views, pay people for using their referral links, buy and use .edu mails to get discounts on whatever, etc. All these actions harm the company or other users in some way.

Edit 2: Well, whether returning coins or not also shows honesty of the user.