So you're claiming that you're mining with a FPGA cluster of far over 600gh? Jikes, that's impressive! Kudos for that!
2. The botnet detection is based upon the effeciency (getworks vs. stales in this case), amount of connections, source of connections, amount of unique IP's, IP2location for those IP's and much more I'm not going to publicly announce, as it in fact are there for a reason.
3. Yes, but stales do consume and waste bandwidth - the point i was trying to make was that it was no "small" operation, it was a massive spike in hashrate, connections, traffic, getworks and stales.
4. I really doubt that, especially as you're using TOR (might i ask why?) for the miners (which is one of the things our botnet detection adds points for).
5. We're working on that, see my posts above. I'm well aware of that. We've haven't just had the time (and money, as time is money) to implement it...
--
Regards, Jim
Bit LC Inc.
https://www.bitlc.netEDIT:
I am also very disappointed that you have basically told me you are going to steal the funds that I have already accumulated for work performed simply because your pool can't handle my hashrate.
I've sent you an e-mail regarding that, we can take that privately.