Re: NEM (XEM) Official Thread - New Update 0.6.42

This has been my experience. And consider we are holding 2 NEM stakes with us (so far). So, if I'm doing this, it's really because I don't think it always a matter of money, but I believe sometimes is a matter of fairness.

Let me get the facts straight:

You've registered 4 stakes, although it was clearly stated, one can register 2
The other accounts have 1 post each (I won't comment on that)
You've received 2 stakes
now you're complaining, cause you got caught...

I call that impertinency, welcome to my ignore list

Let me rectify your inferences:

- WE have registered 4 stakes. 4 different individuals that live under the same roof, and that, consequence of that, share same Internet connection.

- I've got the other 3 housemate involved because of NEM, when even me was pretty new on Crypto. They have to register to BTC Talks to get a stake. They really didn't care about BTC Talk forum. And still don't. WE checked periodically from one computer, together. No need to post anything if you don't really need to ask, isn't it
I DIDN'T FIND ANYWHERE IN THE RULE BOOK REGARDING BEING AN ACTIVE MEMBER WITH AT LEST 10000000000 POSTS DONE WHEN DISTRIBUTION WILL COME.... Cheesy

So good call when you say "I won't comment on that" +1 for you

- We have received 2 stakes, but we paid for 4. All our stakes required money, we weren't in the first pages were Stakes were free. wouldn't you complain for true ?

- Now I'm complaining, yes, because we didn't break any rules at the time, when I decided to get other people involved in NEM, since NEM needed more people involved at the time, according to the developer. I'm talking about the smart one.
I had to lend the other 3 guys some BTC and NXT to let them buy Stakes, because they were brand new on Cryptos.
Now i have 3 mates that are thinking I cheated them. And they will never believe in Crypto anymore.
So no stakes, no money back. And that wasn't stated in the rule book at the time. We didn't break any rules when we decided to go in together.
RULES IN THE 1ST REGISTRATION POST SHOULD HAVE SAID something like:" IT WILL BE TOTALLY UP TO DEVS if GIVING OR NOT STAKES TO ANYONE LEGITIMATELY BOUGHT A RESERVATION. THIS WILL BE DONE ACCORDING TO RULES THAT DON'T EXIST YET."
In that case, fair enough... Grin

Btw, following your provocation, I would call your behaviour dullness. Welcome to my pointless list. Roll Eyes

But thanks to worry so much about my case anyway.

I can feel your sincerity in your writing and feel like you had a really tough break.

And at the same time I thank you in your understanding of the situation. While it's true that some people truly do live with three roommates and all four are in crypto, there was sock group after sock group saying that stakes were bought a for their roommates or six workmates. One guy was even like saying for his grandmother and three sisters and two brothers and all from accounts with less than five postings.

There was a tough and hard decision to make where a few would suffer but the 99% would have really been rightfully busted as socks. But each cluster wasn't wiped out entirely. They all got at the two stake minimum.

But by making a rule and sticking to it even in hard times in the long run NEMs distribution will be better.