Why do you think innovations can be technical only?
In the U.S or Japan you can patent not only technical solutions as innovations.
And why do you think that technical innovations cannot be implemented later?
Why do you think that innovations is the most important thing?
Huntercoin (HUC) is completely innovative, it is a pioneer of Human-proof, with market capitalization $17,000.
Dogecoin is not innovative with market capitalization $18 million.
Following your logic and your "sh*t argument", Dogecoin is "sh*t" coin?
Btw Dogecoin was based on a code of one of current Mooncoin's developers.
In the U.S or Japan you can patent not only technical solutions as innovations.
And why do you think that technical innovations cannot be implemented later?
Why do you think that innovations is the most important thing?
Huntercoin (HUC) is completely innovative, it is a pioneer of Human-proof, with market capitalization $17,000.
Dogecoin is not innovative with market capitalization $18 million.
Following your logic and your "sh*t argument", Dogecoin is "sh*t" coin?
Btw Dogecoin was based on a code of one of current Mooncoin's developers.
Marketing and memes are fading away with time. Innovations last longer and contribute to the community. Technologically Dogecoin is a popular shitcoin with a pretty good marketing indeed. Period. However if we take a look at the impact of it, I think DOGE was the gate to cryptos for many people, and probably contributed a lot in generally increasing the acceptance and publicity of cryptoes, so I tend to agree in some cases even shitcoins can serve a good cause
.