Now its Frap.doc's turn to get rekt:
Piling every proof-of-work quorum system in the world into one dataset doesn't scale.
Bitcoin users might get increasingly tyrannical about limiting the size of the chain so it's easy for lots of users and small devices.
Bitcoin users might get increasingly tyrannical about limiting the size of the chain so it's easy for lots of users and small devices.
You should keep in mind this while posting.
Maybe then you would take a full quote of a post, instead of just extracting a part out of its context in order to prove your point.
BitDNS users might be completely liberal about adding any large data features since relatively few domain registrars are needed, while Bitcoin users might get increasingly tyrannical about limiting the size of the chain so it's easy for lots of users and small devices.
But I guess that intellectual honesty has never been your goal here
"Extracting?" What an interesting word choice.
You make it sound like I put Satoshi's quote through some kind of violent mechanical processing, instead of the commonplace practice of editing for clarity and brevity. But we all understand your goal here is to impute and exaggerate my intellectual dishonesty, in order to distract from the larger issue of why Team Gavinista is losing the Bitcoin Civil War.
The BitDNS discussion was not germane and thus excluded. A link to the full text of the primary source was provided.