So, again like today, I guess. Sorry my system is not perfect 
That was not my point. If your system is like today, then people will be able to sell their BIS. They would basically endebt for life. They would not care much since it's the State that would repay this debt. I'm pretty sure bankers will be very happy with your system.Quote
You will be completely free to vote against any proposals for tax increase, campaign against them on blogs, and if you still run against a majority, then emigrate. Not so different than nowadays.
Yeah, great. Vote like majority, obey or get the fuck out. Wonderful.Quote
LOL, I am the OP, and I've spent 50 EUR to pay my yearly membership fee. That's as much as I can give them.
Well, you could have spent those 50 EUR to buy a share and you would have received about 1 EUR a year by doing nothing. That would have been much more of a actual step towards your project of basic income.Quote
Still, to live on dividends, you do need a significant capital. What would 10 USD invested in stock bring your yearly as a ROI? A cent? ten, maybe? To survive on dividends you do need a substantial capital. I'm not going to ask you how much yours is, but you do agree with me that it must be at least a 5 digit figure with today's dividend rates. Such a sum would be unachievable for a lower-middle class person, even with hard work.
It very much depend on your lifestyle. Also, I do not only live on dividends. I have other financial assets. That's not the issue anyway.
Thing is, the way I see it, share and stock markets are the only thing that could fulfill the function you are promoting. It is basically designed for that: allowing people to share the excess of wealth produced by companies. The only feature that does not fit your concept, is that shares and stocks are not evenly distributed. So most people can not live on dividends because they just do not own enough shares. And yet, globally if the wealth is somewhere, it is there.
So what's the way to make this distribution more even? Do you have to steal to people who have some, in order to give to people who do not have any? It won't work: you're a living proof of that. If you don't have shares, it's not because you can't, it's because you don't want to. You prefer giving money to political organizations.
Instead of using force and stealing people to give shares to people who do not even want to own shares, you should promote the idea of owning shares. Eventually, if more people get convinced that it's ok to invest and receive money from doing nothing, the distribution of shares will be more even.