...

TPTB wrote re his recent work (blue):

"As many know from my posts in the Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP thread, I claim to have invented a very different form of decentralized consensus network algorithm which employs proof-of-work and a block chain, but which does not have the scaling nor centralization issues of Satoshi's design.

I have recently also invented new math which is superior to both Cryptonote and Blockstream's Confidential Transactions.

I have made also numerous other innovations on crypto-currency design.

I even explained that I would be able to show it is possible to launch a coin by ICO and prove mathematically that the controlling group could not own more than x% of the total coin supply.

You'd think with such designs at-hand, that I would be ecstatic and optimistic. The reason I've been somewhat dismissive about my capabilities lately, is because I nearly wasted the entire past 6 weeks trying to locate a mathematician (with strong interest or knowledge in discrete math and especially applicability to Berstein's EdDSA) who would work with me to peer review my work and also a programmer to help me implement. I am a programmer, but it just seems impractical to try to implement something of such complexity all by oneself.

I had commitments for angel investment (i.e. a controlling group was taking form) in order to hire the help, but I couldn't find anyone who is qualified that is both interested and willing to follow a few basic computer security policies. Even some of the potential angel investors (e.g. rpietila) are unwilling to institute basic computer security policies with my assistance, so it as if no one really gives a fuck about what is happening to the world.

I had one junior-level programmer express interest to work with me and he had some experience coding a block chain explorer in the past, but he refused to learn any new programming language and only is available in Javascript. I eat programming languages for breakfast. One has to wonder how someone with such myopia could really grasp the math and wide range aptitude required. So I respectfully declined.

I am dismayed. My inventions are real and could potentially save the planet, yet no one is helping."


Angel Investors, Venture Capitalists, and similar require details, and in a manner they can understand, or at least that people they know can understand.  "These guys hold the whip hand."  

I have seen this, but not participated directly myself, I was a beneficiary to a small degree and watched the process from start to finish (sale of a start-up small & specialized software company to a big company).  The FOUNDER of that small company did NOT make most of the money, he made a LOT, but more of the gains went to various investment companies and "Family Offices".

The money is out there when you can prove what you have is unique and will make LOTS of people a LOT of money for such high risks (and a complicated program taking on various entrenched parties is high risk, please do not fool yourself, this would be seen by me and everyone as high risk).

rpietila seems to be the one who might know the most about what you are up to.  You may have to humble yourself, approach him again, and offer better terms and more details that he can check out among his own network.  [Of course I have no idea what your relationship proposals were like before.]

If you get ONE rich & smart guy on-board, you will find others.  But, you will have to share the gains, and let them run at least some things should they choose.  You land the money (via a good Business Plan, etc.), you will find programmers, even there in The Philippines.  You are the one seeking money, you are the one who has to convince the CAPITALISTS to pony up...  Prove you have something and that other participants would understand what you are doing and would share the gains, you could probably raise $100,000 + before long.

I know that's not the kind of thing that revolutionaries want to hear, but that's the way it works in my very limited experience.