Peter's problem, if you call it a problem at all, is that I've only seen one person have the confidence or ability to step up and discuss the math with him. That's pretty damn impressive.
Instead, all we get is a childish scolding by a hand waving armchair logic dev also by the name of Peter.
That's why I think this will not be solved with more debate.
More debate won't solve this
*in the way you prefer.*But more debate prolongs the stalemate,