Re: Doesn't Maidsafe deprecate basically EVERYTHING?

safecoin lost my interest at the bit where it said no bloat because safecoin confess its own storage...
in short.. they are just a upload website with a gimmicky way of having users access data to pretend to be decentralized..
its like saying to users its decentralized because all the users download a torrent program.. but all the seeds are on safecoins servers...
much like etherium and nxt are centralized coin holders pretending to be proper decentralized blockchains..
when will the world of the 1990's centralized mysql database lovers, ever learn..

i dont even understand why this is being blatently advertised on bitcoin/blockchain based forums.. when it has nothing to do with it

Are you serious? I don't think you understand how maidsafe works and what can beachieved with it to claim that. You really think this is offtopic? It's all crypto after all and related to my question (im comparing technologies).

read it.
no blocks...

and the data is not decentralised.. its like saying that banks are decentralised because although the data is not on users computers.. there is data on computers managed by different branches of a bank in different towns.. so maidsafe is just a offshoot of cloudhosting under the false pretense of being a linked to bitcoin technology..

if the only thing that you think links maidsafe to bitcoin is cryptography.. then we might aswell say banks are cryptographic money too as their data is also secured using encryption..

encryption is nothing new or special.. but if its not on a blockchain that anyone can be part of.. then its no different to centralized services that have been around for ages.

but i am sorry to ruin your advertising campaign..

I think it is you that doesn't understand maidsafe but please continue this conversation.

One thing is certain - a new internet cutting out ISPs will be the future. Probably a good bit in the future, and probably reliant on things such as if Bitcoin matures enough for people to understand why they should use it.

Both would compliment each other, whether for good or bad.

The strong desire to recreate the internet exists more from individuals than current businesses and governments.

Money. Jobs.

The agreement would have to be -- cutting out massive amounts of jobs is better in the long-run, where these people now need to change/adapt into a new work setting -- an adjustment to the global economy.

Country laws do not matter in a global internet for work. We all employ our self after all..

Which type of work will benefit you and the economy most?

Replacing the need for more humans as if we aren't already populated enough. This is being done and will continue.

Labor jobs will suffer more.

Everyday man invests more trust in machine over man.