Post
Topic
Board Politics & Society
Re: Snowden Scam is a Zionist Scare Tactic
by
jaysabi
on 07/08/2015, 03:55:04 UTC
Snowden Scam is a Zionist Scare Tactic

Make no mistake about it Edward Snowden is a fraudster and fabricator, just like the rest of the scam artists who have been elevated to heroic status recently, foisted upon the American people on false pretense. There is nothing heroic about his acts: it is a set up. He has been fed his lines, and he is doing so for monetary gain.

Powerful Zionist Jews, including talk show hosts Michael Savage and Alex Jones, have given Snowden great support. English Zionsts have been his major backbone, including Glenn Greenwald and collaborators at the UK’s The Guardian.  Would the Zionists give such tacit support to their arch-enemy? Whether whistle blower or not Snowden, has apparently revealed issues of a top secret nature. Savage and Jones find this to be grand.

Top secret or not, Snowden has revealed nothing new. Whatever he has said has amount to the creation of agitation. His father was a big man in the Coast Guard and is running cover for the scam. None of what Snowden has said or any of the supposed consequences are believable. No matter: what perfect timing as a distraction. Plus, blame it all on American institutions, the NSA and/or CIA, but say nothing about that exceedingly corrupt, murderous spy agency, the Mossad.

See more: http://nodisinfo.com/snowden-is-a-zionist-mole-proof/

Entire point undermined by obvious bolded falsehood. The fact that we knew of none of the illegal programs before he exposed them, nor would we have dared to imagine the extent to which they have developed, renders his revelations "new."

Every news item is not a zionist conspiracy theory...

I don't necessarily believe this is Zionist plot, I really have no way of knowing for sure either way, but the claim that no one knew about these programs before Snowden came forward is absolute bullshit. I remember reading about the PRISM program over ten years ago. In fact almost nothing he revealed was not already under discussion by those that took the time to educate themselves on the subject. I explain more here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1145833.msg12073084#msg12073084

There is nothing substantive there about Snowden's revelations being old except your statement that it is. Further, I find it unlikely you read about PRISM over ten years ago when the program is at most 8 years old (http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonkblog/wp/2013/06/06/how-congress-unknowingly-legalized-prism-in-2007/). Even if the programs were publicly known long before Snowden shed a light on them, an assertion that is called into question by your lack of sources and now disproven anecdote, the extent of how robust the programs were and how much data the NSA had access to, with the seeming complicity of major US technology firms, is the real Snowden revelation. If you have any actual evidence to support the claim that Snowden's revelations in this vein were not new, I'd be happy to review them and amend my understanding of the situation accordingly.