If the majority of people decided that slavery was OK again, would that make it OK to enslave the minority they picked?
Why does a government
founded on a
logical fallacy seem like a good idea to you?
You have constitution, safeguarding basic rights. You could possibly try and change the constitution, but for that you need an overwhelming majority, which just doesn't happen in a democracy. Even landslide victories are like 60%.
Check the exceptions on the wikipedia page you linked to. Income redistribution falls withing the lines of social convention and safety, therefore the fallacy does not apply here.
The constitution was in effect when slavery was happening. Myrkul you have failed to address the point that was made.